QA Engineer Interview Question : What to Do When a Major Bug Strikes Before Product Release?

Join Our Offical Telegram Channel
Real time QA Engineer Interview Question

In the fast-paced world of software development, unforeseen challenges are bound to arise. One such challenge is encountering a significant bug in the application on the brink of a scheduled product release. As a tester, the pressure is on to ensure a smooth release without compromising the product’s quality. In this article, we’ll delve into the steps a tester can take when facing this high-stakes scenario.

QA Engineer Interview Question

Real time QA Engineer Interview Question
Question: Imagine a scenario where the product release is scheduled for tomorrow, but today you encounter a major bug in the application. As a tester, what steps would you take in this situation
Answer: Upon discovering a major bug a day before the planned product release, I would isolate, document, and assess the severity of the bug, promptly notify stakeholders and hold an emergency meeting to discuss solutions, evaluate risks, consider temporary fixes, conduct regression testing, retest the fix, maintain ongoing communication with stakeholders, monitor the situation post-release, and conduct a post-mortem analysis for future improvements.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to release the application with the bug or delay the release is a business decision that should be made by the product manager in consultation with the development team and the QA team. However, as a QA engineer, I would play an important role in providing information and making recommendations to help the product manager make the best decision for the product and its users.

The above answer is in brief, For more detailed answer and for more information & better understanding  Read the full article once.

In a scenario where a major bug is discovered in the application on the day before the planned product release, as a QA Engineer, I would take the following steps to effectively manage the situation:

  1. Isolate and Replicate the Bug: First, I would isolate the bug and attempt to replicate it consistently. Understanding the conditions that trigger the bug is crucial for effective communication and resolution.
  2. Document the Bug: I would document the bug with detailed information, including steps to reproduce, expected behavior, actual behavior, screenshots, and any relevant log files. This documentation will help the development team understand the issue better.
  3. Severity Assessment: I would assess the severity of the bug based on its impact on the application’s functionality, user experience, and the likelihood of occurrence. This will help prioritize the bug within the development and release process.
  4. Communicate Immediately: I would notify the development team, project manager, and any relevant stakeholders about the bug as soon as possible. Timely communication is essential to ensure everyone is aware of the situation and can collaborate on a solution.
  5. Emergency Meeting: If necessary, I would participate in an emergency meeting with the development team, project manager, and other stakeholders to discuss the bug’s impact and potential solutions. This meeting would help decide whether to proceed with the release, delay it, or take alternative actions.
  6. Evaluate Risk and Impact: Working closely with the development team, I would assess the risk associated with the bug and its potential impact on the end users. This assessment will guide decisions about the release strategy.
  7. Explore Temporary Solutions: Depending on the severity of the bug and the time available, I might explore temporary workarounds or patches that can be implemented quickly to mitigate the issue without compromising the release.
  8. Regression Testing: If a temporary solution is implemented, I would conduct focused regression testing to ensure that the bug fix hasn’t introduced any new issues or regressions in other parts of the application.
  9. Retest the Fix: Once the development team provides a fix for the bug, I would thoroughly test the fix in a controlled testing environment to ensure that the issue is resolved and no new problems arise.
  10. Update Stakeholders: I would keep all stakeholders informed about the progress of bug resolution, testing, and any changes in the release schedule. Transparency is essential to manage expectations.
  11. Continuous Monitoring: Even after the release, I would continue monitoring the application to ensure that the bug fix works as expected in the production environment and to promptly address any unforeseen issues.
  12. Post-Mortem Analysis: After the release, I would recommend conducting a post-mortem analysis to review the situation, identify lessons learned, and determine any process improvements that can prevent similar incidents in the future.

Ultimately, my goal would be to work collaboratively with the development team and other stakeholders to make informed decisions that prioritize the quality and stability of the product while minimizing disruption to the release schedule.

Conclusion : Facing a major bug on the eve of a product release is undoubtedly a stressful situation. However, by following a structured approach—remaining composed, documenting thoroughly, collaborating effectively, and making informed decisions—testers can navigate these challenges and contribute to a successful product release. This scenario underscores the importance of adaptability and problem-solving skills in the world of software testing, where surprises are a part of the journey.

QA Engineer Interview Question

QA Engineer Interview Question

Test Your knowledge with some questions

1 / 5

What is the significance of conducting regression testing when addressing a major bug before a product release?

2 / 5

What can a tester learn from a post-mortem analysis conducted after resolving a major bug before a product release?


3 / 5

Why is it important for a tester to consider potential temporary solutions for a major bug before a product release?

A) . B)  C)  D)

4 / 5

What role does documentation play when addressing a major bug discovered before a product release?


5 / 5

After the bug is fixed and the product is released, what is the recommended course of action for the tester?


Your score is

The average score is 75%


Look into some vacancies 

QA Engineer Interview Question